Growth-hormone peptides · Evidence comparison

Sermorelin vs Tesamorelin

Two GHRH-analog peptides with real regulatory histories — one formerly approved, one currently approved — often compared for body composition.

Sermorelin

SRaises growth hormone / IGF-1 and modestly improves body composition in older adults
vs

Tesamorelin

S+Reduces excess visceral abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy

Headline claim shown. Grades are claim-specific — see the full breakdown below.

The evidence, side by side

Every graded claim from each brief. Grades are read straight from the source-checked briefs — one molecule can be strong for one use and weak for another.

Growth hormone / longevity (GHRH analog)

Sermorelin

Evidence grades

S
Raises growth hormone / IGF-1 and modestly improves body composition in older adultsLimited human evidence
B
Reverses aging, builds muscle, or improves health as an 'anti-aging' therapy in healthy adultsMostly anecdotal
C
Compounded / gray-market sermorelin is a proven, equivalent substitute for approved growth-hormone therapyUnsupported

Metabolic / fat reduction (GHRH analog)

Tesamorelin

Evidence grades

S+
Reduces excess visceral abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophyStrong clinical evidence
S
Reduces liver fat (NAFLD) in people with HIVLimited human evidence
B
Improves body composition or slows aging in healthy (non-HIV) adultsMostly anecdotal
C
'Research' / gray-market tesamorelin is a safe, equivalent substitute for the approved drugUnsupported

Regulatory status at a glance

Sermorelin

Formerly FDA-approved as Geref (sermorelin acetate): the 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg vials were approved to treat idiopathic growth-hormone deficiency in children with growth failure, and a 0.05 mg formulation was approved as a diagnostic to test the pituitary's ability to secrete growth hormone. The manufacturer discontinued it and the FDA withdrew approval in 2009 — and the FDA expressly determined this was NOT for reasons of safety or effectiveness, but commercial (it could not compete with recombinant human growth hormone). No FDA-approved sermorelin product is currently marketed in the US; it is now supplied mainly through compounding pharmacies and the gray market, and its popular off-label use for anti-aging, body composition, and 'GH optimization' in healthy adults is unapproved. As a growth-hormone-releasing factor it is prohibited in sport by WADA (category S2). Status varies by country and can change; this is not medical or legal advice.

Tesamorelin

FDA-approved prescription drug (Egrifta, Egrifta SV, Egrifta WR; tesamorelin), approved November 2010 for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy — its only approved indication. A synthetic GHRH (growth-hormone-releasing factor) analog given by daily subcutaneous injection. Contraindicated in active malignancy, pregnancy, and disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis; can raise blood sugar (glucose intolerance / diabetes). Use for general body composition, muscle building, or anti-aging in people without HIV-associated lipodystrophy is off-label and not FDA-approved. Tesamorelin sold online as a 'research chemical' is not the approved product. Prohibited in sport by WADA (S2, growth-hormone-releasing factors).

Key differences

  • Tesamorelin is currently FDA-approved (Egrifta) and graded S+ for visceral-fat reduction in HIV lipodystrophy; sermorelin was formerly approved (Geref) and is graded S for raising GH/IGF-1 with modest body-composition change in older adults.
  • Neither is approved for anti-aging or body composition in healthy adults — those uses are graded B for both.
  • Tesamorelin can raise blood sugar; sermorelin was withdrawn for commercial (not safety) reasons and is now compounded/gray-market.
  • Both are WADA-banned.

The bottom line

Both have legitimate approval histories and real but narrow human data; neither is proven for the healthy-adult 'GH optimization' use they're sought for. We don't recommend either — we show the approved use, the grade behind it, and where the evidence stops.

PeptideIQ Base does not recommend, rank, or endorse any peptide, dose, or product. We grade the strength of the evidence so you can read it for yourself.

See every peptide, graded on one page

The Peptide Evidence Report Card grades all our peptides S+ to C on the strength of the human evidence. Research only — no hype, never a recommendation.

Get the report card →